Legal Opinion
Ford-Bey v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 2, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-2039Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ISMAEL FORD-BEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-2039 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Ismael Ford-Bey, proceeding pro se, filed a motion in February, 2019 pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) seeking the return of personal property that he alleges was seized from his residence in Washington, D.C. and his girlfriend’s residence in Alexandria, Virginia, almost seven years earlier in August, 2012, by Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) agents. Pl.’s…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.