Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1929PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Claims, holding that the defendant, the State of New York, had failed to perform its contract with the claimants, gave judgment in claimants’ favor for the damages resulting from the breach. These damages were unliquidated when the action was begun, but interest upon the amount recovered was included in the judgment. This was done pursuant to Civil Practice Act, section 480, as amended by Laws of 1927, chapter 623, which provides that in every action then pending or thereafter brought “ wherein any sum of money shall be awarded by verdict, report or decision upon a cause of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Farrington v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. J. B. Preston Co. v. FunkhouserNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Adirondack League Club v. Board of Black River Regulating DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Greenaway's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Fulton Foundation v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API