Legal Opinion

Farrington v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1928PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

The claimant was one of five persons who held positions as detective agents in the office of the Comptroller of the State. The positions were in the competitive class of the civil service. In the year 1923 the Legislature appropriated moneys to pay for the services of not more than three of such agents. It, therefore, became necessary for the Comptroller to abolish two of the positions. It was then the law that, whenever a position in the competitive class of the civil service was abolished, the occupant should be suspended without pay; and that such suspension should be made in the inverse…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Matter of Chapman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. v. . Canal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Munro v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. People Ex Rel. Swift v. . LuceNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Sharapata v. Town of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Schulz v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Matter of Evans v. BerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Jackson v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. People v. OhrensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API