Legal Opinion

People v. Hagan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1969PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

The proof that defendants participated in the assassination of Malcolm X is abundant. The main question of law presented is whether the exclusion of the press and public from the courtroom during a small segment of the trial deprived defendants of their right to a public trial. This right is provided both by the Constitution of the United 'States and by the statutes of New York.

The exclusion occurred during the testimony of a "witness, Timberlake, because it was represented to the court that Timberlake believed his life was in danger if he testified publicly and would refuse to testify on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. JelkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Gannett Co. v. De PasqualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API