People v. Hagan
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The proof that defendants participated in the assassination of Malcolm X is abundant. The main question of law presented is whether the exclusion of the press and public from the courtroom during a small segment of the trial deprived defendants of their right to a public trial. This right is provided both by the Constitution of the United 'States and by the statutes of New York.
The exclusion occurred during the testimony of a "witness, Timberlake, because it was represented to the court that Timberlake believed his life was in danger if he testified publicly and would refuse to testify on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. JelkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- United States v. KobliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Gannett Co. v. De PasqualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. ColonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.