Medstar Ambulance, Inc. v. Mahoney & Obara Insurance
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ricciardone, David, J.
INTRODUCTION
This action arises from an insurance coverage dispute related to a policy that MedStar Ambulance, Inc. (“MedStar”) obtained through Choice Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Choice”). MedStar avers that that policy (“the Choice policy”) was designed to duplicate a previous policy (“the Mahoney policy”) that MedStar obtained through Mahoney & Obara Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Mahoney”), and incorporated a drafting error included in the Mahoney policy.
MedStar brings tort and contract claims against Choice and Mahoney based on the alleged error that was included in both…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Nota Construction Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Martin v. RingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Fidler v. E. M. Parker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.