Legal Opinion

Medstar Ambulance, Inc. v. Mahoney & Obara Insurance

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 20, 2011No. WOCV201002138Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ricciardone, David, J.

INTRODUCTION

This action arises from an insurance coverage dispute related to a policy that MedStar Ambulance, Inc. (“MedStar”) obtained through Choice Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Choice”). MedStar avers that that policy (“the Choice policy”) was designed to duplicate a previous policy (“the Mahoney policy”) that MedStar obtained through Mahoney & Obara Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Mahoney”), and incorporated a drafting error included in the Mahoney policy.

MedStar brings tort and contract claims against Choice and Mahoney based on the alleged error that was included in both…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Nota Construction Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  4. Martin v. RingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Fidler v. E. M. Parker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API