Legal Opinion

Martin v. Ring

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 3, 1987PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.

The plaintiff brought this negligence action against Joseph Dooley (now deceased) for injuries allegedly sustained while working on the porch of Dooley’s house. Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion in limine to preclude introduction of evidence that the plaintiff suffered a back injury as a result of the accident. The defendant asserted that the plaintiff was collaterally estopped from raising this issue by an adverse decision of the Industrial Accident Board (board), which found that the plaintiff’s back injury did not result from his fall from Dooley’s porch. The trial judge granted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Fidler v. E. M. Parker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Home Owners Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Northwestern Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Kowalski v. GagneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. In Re Sonus Networks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Francis A. Willhauck, Jr. v. Paul HalpinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Miles v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Tuper v. North Adams Ambulance Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API