Legal Opinion

Seminara v. Smith

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 19, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

89 N.J. Super. 349 (1965)

215 A.2d 47

CARMEN SEMINARA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT

v.

MERCER D. SMITH, TOWNSHIP CLERK OF THE TOWNSHIP OF FRANKLIN, AND HARRY STILWELL, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 15, 1965.

Decided November 19, 1965.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.

Mr. Richard S. Cohen argued the cause for appellant Harry Stilwell, Jr.

Mr. David Linett argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Gross, Weissberger & Linett, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman argued the cause for Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, amicus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrow v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  2. Trugman v. ReichensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Hambright v. MartiniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Thompson v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Giuliano v. ReichensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. In Re SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API