Legal Opinion

Trugman v. Reichenstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 9, 1958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintkatjb, C. J.

On May 13, 1958 the City of Newark held its regular municipal election to choose a mayor, a ward councilman in each of its five wards, and four councilmen at large. The city is governed by Mayor-Council Plan C of the Eaulkner Act. N. J. S. A. 40:69A-55 to 40:69A-60.

Ten candidates contended for the four offices of councilmen at large. The city clerk concluded that the four candidates who received the greatest number of votes were elected and the board of canvassers made the same determination. Plaintiff, who ran fifth, brought this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anthony v. ReaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Trugman v. ReichensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Febbi v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employment SEC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. HUDSON CTY. NAT'L BK v. Provident Inst. for SavingsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. In Re Hackensack Recall ElectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Giuliano v. ReichensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  5. Old Stone Bank v. MichaelsonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API