Dorris v. Crowder
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an action brought to recover the reasonable value of services rendered by plaintiffs in defending the defendant against a charge of murder. Plaintiffs had judgment and defendant has appealed.
Two of the three questions presented are novel and of first impression in California. They are: (1) Can attorneys appointed by the court to defend an insane person charged with murder in the first degree charge him a fee when, after he had been found insane, it was discovered that he was possessed of an estate of nearly $12,000.00? and (2) do the provisions of the Probate Code (secs. 705 to 714…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carter v. . BeckwithNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Askey v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Rowe v. Yuba CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Munson v. WashbandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Leonard v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Consolidated Produce Co. v. TakahashiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948