Legal Opinion

Ieremia v. Hilmar Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 2008No. C056319PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.

This case concerns the definition of an owner as used in Proposition 213 and Civil Code section 3333.4, subdivision (a)(2) (section 3333.4(a)(2)), for purposes of noneconomic damages. After a jury trial, plaintiff Puaolele Ieremia was awarded $128,145 in economic damages and $1.9 million in noneconomic damages for personal injuries she suffered in a motor vehicle accident. Defendants Dick Wyatt Piersma and Hilmar Unified School District claim on appeal the trial court erred in allowing plaintiff to obtain an award of noneconomic damages at trial. Defendants contend…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Winograd v. American Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API