Legal Opinion
Vallabharpurapu v. Burger King Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 14, 2011No. 11-cv-667 WHA (JSC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES (Dkt. No. 61)
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Now pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (Dkt. No. 61) and Defendant’s opposed Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (Dkt. No. 123). Having considered the parties’ written submissions, and having had the benefit of oral argument on September 15, 2011, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File a Surreply and GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel.
*614FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This putative class action was filed by 27…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Vinole v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hernandez v. Polanco Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Gray v. Golden Gate National Recreational AreaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Independent Living Center v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Collardey v. Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Sepulveda v. ZhouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021