Legal Opinion

Batistich v. Brennan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 4, 1965Published

1Opinion of the Court

45 N.J. 533 (1965)

213 A.2d 761

ANDREW F. BATISTICH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MARTIN BRENNAN, CLERK OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND LOUIS DePASCALE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND EDWARD J. BORRONE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 30, 1965.

Decided October 4, 1965.

Mr. Isadore Glauberman argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. John J. Sheehy, attorney).

Mr. Joseph A. Davis argued the cause for the respondent.

Mr. Alan B. Handler argued the cause amicus curiae.

2Per curiam

The trial court held that L. 1956, c. 24 (N.J.S.A. 40:69A-161.1) was…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re ClevelandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  2. Bucino v. MaloneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Batistich v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. State ex rel. Van Riper v. ParsonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
  5. Batistich v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API