Legal Opinion
Bucino v. Malone
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 30, 1953PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Vanderbilt, C. J.
This appeal questions the constitutionality of the Eaulkner Act, L. 1950, c. 210, N. J. 8. A. 40 :691 — 1 et seq.
The facts are not in dispute. Since 1915 the City of Hoboken has been governed under the Walsh Act, B. S. 40:70-1 et seq., by a board of five commissioners. On May 8, 1951 the present commissioners were elected for a term of four years. Soon after taking office the city commission adopted a resolution submitting to the voters the question of electing a charter commission under the Eaulkner Act,hereinafter described. At the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3Cited by34 opinions
- Township of Mahwah v. Bergen County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Smith v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Inganamort v. Bor. of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- In Re FreygangNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- City of Passaic v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension Fund CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.