Legal Opinion

Batistich v. Brennan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 4, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court held that L. 1956, c. 24 (N. J. S. A. 40 :69A-161.1) was invalid because it was not enacted in accordance with the constitutional command relating to the enactment of a special or local law regulating the internal affairs of municipalities. Art. IV, sec. VII, pars. 7, 8, 9 and 10. The Appellate Division agreed, 88 N. J. Super. 84 (1965), and the appeal from its judgment comes to us as of right. R. R. 1:2-1 (a).

The Optional Municipal Charter Law (popularly known as the Faulkner Act) comprehensiA'ely provides 15 plans of local government and leaves the adoption of any of them to…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Giuliano v. ReichensteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Mason v. CITY OF PATERSONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Batistich v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Vreeland v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API