Legal Opinion
State v. Board of Health
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 6, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On certiorari.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
The prosecutor seeks to set aside a portion of article 8 of the sanitary code of Montclair, relating to milk *219and its production. The portion of which he complains reads as follows: "No milk shall be sold or offered for sale or distributed in the town of Montclair except from cows in good health, nor unless the cows from which it is obtained have within one year been examined by a veterinarian whose competency is vouched for by the State Veterinary Association of the state in which the herd is located, and a certificate signed by such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Laurel Hill Cemetery v. City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- City of New Orleans v. CharouLeauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- State v. Armour & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Winfield v. LudwigSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Pittsburgh Water Heater Sales Co. v. State Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935