Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Moore
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 25, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
The defendant is charged with a violation of St. 1912, c. 248, § 1, which is as follows: “Carcasses of neat cattle, sheep or swine slaughtered without the Commonwealth shall be deemed unfit for human food and shall not be sold or offered for .sale unless they have been inspected at the time of slaughter by an official inspector, and unless, if not condemned, they have been stamped or branded by said inspector in like manner as those inspected by the United States Bureau of Animal Industry for interstate trade. By ‘ official inspector ’ is meant one appointed or approved either (a) by the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Slome v. Chief of Police of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Ayer v. Commissioner of AdministrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Donovan v. Suffolk County Apportionment CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.