Legal Opinion
Marr v. WMX Technologies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 12, 1998No. SC 15802PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted class action certification with respect to the plaintiffs’ claims under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the defendants’ improper operation of a landfill polluted the area surrounding the plaintiffs’ homes and violated CUTPA. The trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification over the defendants’ objection that the complaint failed to allege *678the elements of a CUTPA violation. We affirm…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Gold Strike Stamp Company, a Utah Corporation v. A. Sherman Christensen, District Judge, B. Delos Gardner, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Samuel v. University of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rivera v. Veterans Memorial Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Standard Petroleum Co. v. Faugno Acquisition, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Robichaud v. Hewlett Packard Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Cais v. Citizens Savings Bank of Connecticut, No. 556544 (Sep. 17, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.