Legal Opinion
Samuel v. University of Pittsburgh
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 29, 1976No. Nos. 75-1965-75-1968PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mr. Justice CLARK:
Appellants, Samuel and Meyers, filed this class action against the appellees, the University of Pittsburgh, Temple University and Pennsylvania State University (Universities), the Governor, Attorney General, and Auditor General of Pennsylvania under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and thereafter Lambert and Farley intervened therein. Appellants attack a statewide residency rule B(2) and its successors,1 applied by Universities, which provide that for tuition purposes the domicile of the wife is that of the husband. Appellants claim that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Paton v. La PradeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Elena Class v. Nicholas NortonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Finberg v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Richard J. Mayberry v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Morrow v. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Hamid R. Kashani v. Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.