Legal Opinion

Biggs v. . Moffitt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

This appeal presents this question: After the time for answering the complaint has expired, may the defendant, under the provisions of O. S., 545, file an amended answer, as a matter of right?

The decisions of this Court answer “No.” McIntosh, N. C. P. & P., p. 512; Barnes v. Crawford, 115 N. C., 76, 20 S. E., 386; Goodwin v. Fertilizer Works, 121 N. C., 91, 28 S. E., 192; Discount Corporation v. Butler, 200 N. C., 709, 158 S. E., 249.

It is .proper here to note that this statute is in the main a part of section 131 of the Code of Civil Procedure of North Carolina, ratified in 1868, bearing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Goodwin v. Caraleigh Phosphate & Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Discount Corporation v. . ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Consolidated Vending Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Hardy v. . MayoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Osborne v. . Canton and Kinsland v. . MacKeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Whitehurst v. . HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API