Classic Communications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motions to dismiss of defendants City of Pal-co (Doe. 43), City of Damar (Doc. 44), City of Morland (Doc. 45), City of Norcatur (Doc. 48), and City of Gorham (Doc. 50). For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are uneontroverted or, where controverted, construed in a manner most favorable to the plaintiffs as the non-moving parties.
In 1992, Classic Communications, Inc. initiated efforts to expand its telecommunications business…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swartz v. BeachDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
- Republic Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. v. Torchmark Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Interior Contractors, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Newman Memorial County HospitalDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Electrical Inspectors, Inc. v. Village of LynbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.