Legal Opinion

State v. Spry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 2000No. 10-96-06248; CA A96849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Defendant appeals from his convictions of first-degree burglary, menacing and second-degree criminal mischief. Through his counsel’s brief and a separate pro se supplemental brief, defendant makes a combined total of 10 assignments of error. We discuss only one of the assignments, and we affirm.

Defendant was in custody and was subject to the release requirement of ORS 136.290(2), 1 unless his trial began by January 16,1997. Between the time of defendant’s arrest and Januaiy 16 five separate attorneys had been appointed to represent him and four had withdrawn, primarily due to defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. SchmickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. State v. LingrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State Ex Rel Juvenile Department v. AfanasievCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HugCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Knox v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Tahvili v. Washington Mutual BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. CovernaliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API