Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Davies

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1967No. Civ. No. 29432PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem.*

The cross-complainant, Marjorie Davies, after a journey through a procedural maze, temporarily finds herself with a judgment for $3,500 principal and $1,408.78 interest, based on the quantum meruit count of her cross-complaint against the two cross-defendants. Each cross-defendant has appealed, and we find it necessary to reverse the judgment because of prejudicially erroneous proceedings.

In order to obey the spirit as well as the letter of the mandate of the state Constitution, that ‘ ‘ In the determination of causes” our decisions must “be given in writing, and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Crocker v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Meredith v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Lewin v. Merck & Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Chamberlain v. LoewenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mattes v. PinkneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API