Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Loewenthal

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1902No. S.F. No. 2344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action for legal services rendered the defendant by the plaintiffs. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendant has appealed from the judgment. The judgment-roll upon which the appeal is presented consists of the pleadings, verdict, and judgment, and three bills of exceptions settled prior to the trial upon certain rulings made by the court.

1. The complaint sufficiently states a cause of action to support the judgment. The objections to its sufficiency are directed to the manner in which the facts upon which a recovery is sought are stated, rather than to the absence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coonan v. LoewenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lincoln County Bank v. FettermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ross v. Preferred Accident InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Weiner v. DaviesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API