Legal Opinion

Fry v. George Elkins Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1958No. Civ. 22865PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover a deposit of $4,250 that he made in connection with his contemplated purchase of a home from defendants Miller. The court, however, awarded him a judgment for only $937.50. Plaintiff has appealed.

On May 20,1956, plaintiff made an offer in writing, through defendant George Elkins Company, real estate broker, to purchase the Miller home for $42,500. Plaintiff put up his cheek for $4,250. The offer contained this provision: “This offer is further conditioned upon the buyer obtaining $20,-000.00 loan at 5% for 20 years.” The buyer was advised at that time…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Lynch v. AndrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Phillipe v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Abrams v. MotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Billman v. HenselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API