Legal Opinion
Miller v. O. B. McClintock Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 25, 1941No. 32,629PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Plaintiff as the executrix of the last will and testament of her father, William E. Hardacker, sues to recover §2,400 annual royalty for the years 1938 and 1939 claimed to be due under a patent license contract dated November 25, 1935, wherein he was licensor and defendant was licensee.
The licensor and one Hessel were the owners as tenants in common of patents on a sewer, flooding control apparatus and an improvement thereof issued on October 21, 1930, and April 7, 1931.
By the terms of the contract the licensor granted to the licensee the exclusive license and privilege…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- St. Paul Plow Works v. StarlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Schwab v. BaremoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Wilmot v. Minneapolis Automobile Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Dana v. St. Paul Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Mathwig v. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Lichnovsky v. Ziebart International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Moeller v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Midwest Management Corp. v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.