Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodney Hill
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 9, 1999No. 98-4125PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
In this direct appeal from his conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), Rodney Hill argues that the evidence was not sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his actions during the robbery satisfied the intimidation element of the statute. He does not argue that the government failed to prove any other element of its case. Because there was sufficient evidence for a jury to find that the government proved the intimidation element of the offense, we affirm.
I
FACTS
On December 29, 1997, Mr. Hill entered the St. Paul Federal Bank and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Tommy Ray HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Steven C. Griffin, Marvin M. Rux, and Andrae ScurlockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Nicholas Tyrone MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. David Henson, A/K/A Paul v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Kevin GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. KetchumCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Robert F. Yockel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Adam Jaderany, A/K/A Ahmad Jaderanipoor, A/K/A A.J. Jaderany, A/K/A Ahmad JaderanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.