Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert F. Yockel, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 27, 2003No. 02-3226PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRITZNER, District Judge.
On this appeal, appellant Yockel asserts the district court 2 erred in (1) not holding intent was a requirement for the intimidation element of bank robbery; (2) finding the evidence was sufficient to prove the taking of money by intimidation; (3) precluding defendant from presenting evidence regarding intent and mental health; and (4) failing to grant a continuance or mistrial, requested after the jury was impaneled and sworn, when the court reversed its ruling on the government’s motion in limine regarding the admissibility of defendant’s mental health evidence. We…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Billie Jerome Allen, United States of America v. Norris G. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Karen CameronCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Pohlot, StephenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Jerome WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Robin Brooks, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Monterrio KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.