People v. Makiel
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE DiVITO
delivered the opinion of the court:
The principal questions we address in this case are (1) whether law enforcement officials may properly initiate interrogation, after Miranda admonitions, of an already indicted defendant who had accepted counsel for purposes of a concluded extradition proceeding; and (2) whether the trial court conducted a proper inquiry into the competency of a witness and the relevancy of the evidence he would offer before deciding to exclude his testimony. We answer the first question "yes” and the second one "no.”
Defendant Daniel Makiel was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Daniel Makiel v. Kim ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- People v. MakielAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- State v. GaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- People v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.