Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 19, 1912PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Action to recover damages for alleged breach of contract to purchase a stallion, and for a decree requiring the defendants to execute joint and several notes for the purchase price, brought to the Superior Court in Hartford County and tried to the jury before Reed, J.; verdict and judgment for, the defendants, and appeal by the plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.

The plaintiffs bring this action against five of the signers of a writing which reads as follows:—

“ Simsbury and Vicinity

September, 1907.

Name of Stallion — Esprit. De. Vin 4225

McLaughlin Brothers agree to sell the above named Stallion for $3,600 to the other undersigned subscribers, who, wishing to improve their stock, agree to pay McLaughlin Brothers $300 for each share in said Stallion.

Capital Stock, $3,600. No. of Shares, 12.

Payments to be made in cash; or one-third in one year, one-third in two years, and one-third in three years, after July 1, 1908, secured by joint and several…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  2. Dowd v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  3. Hoxie v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
  4. Gustafson v. RustemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. Burr v. HartySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Russell v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Paiva v. Vanech Heights Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. TIE Communications, Inc. v. KoppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Harper v. AdametzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. Worobey v. SibiethSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API