Legal Opinion

City of North Olmsted v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1980No. 79-1352PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has held that only complainants before the board of revision have standing to appeal a determination by that body to the Board of Tax Appeals.1 Bd. of Edn. v. Bd. of Revision (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 231;2 Lindblom v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1949), 151 Ohio St. 250. The issue remains in the instant cause, however, as to whether appellants were properly denied the status of complainants by the board of revision.

In order to qualify as a complainant, one must file a complaint within the time limit imposed by R. C. 5715.19. R. C. 5715.19 provides in part:

“A complaint against any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanjim Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lindblom v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Griffith v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. May Department Stores Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foods v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lakeside Avenue Ltd. Partnership v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Buckeye Foods v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Columbus Apartments Associates v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Warren County Park District v. Warren County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API