Griffith v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Stanjim was decided by this court on June 12, 1974, which was after taxpayers filed the complaint forms herein, but prior to dismissal of such complaints by the board of revision. Stanjim, at page 235, decided affirmatively that “full compliance with R. C. 5715.19 and 5715.13 is necessary before a county board of revision is empowered to act on the merits of a claim.” Stanjim further recognized the authority of the Board of Tax Appeals to promulgate forms reflecting the data requirements of R. C. 5715.19 and 5715.13, and held, at page 236, as we do here, that subject forms represent “a lawful…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Nucorp, Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Public Square Tower One v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- City of North Olmsted v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Kalmbach Wagner Swine Research Farm v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Board of Education v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.