Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Stern

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1934PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' ¿Lehman, J.

Though the cause of action created in Virginia is not penal in its nature and its enforcement does not offend our sense of justice or menace the public welfare, it by no means follows that the cause of action is enforceable against the executors of the wrongdoer. True, the foreign statute provides that such a cause of action shall not abate by the death of the wrongdoer, and the general rule is that “ whether a claim for damages for a wrong survives the death of the wrongdoer or of the injured person is determined by the law of the place of wrong.” (Proposed Final Draft No. 3 of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Orr v. AhernSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Grant v. McAuliffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. In Re Vilas' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1941

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API