Legal Opinion

Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1938No. Appeal, 121PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

This appeal is from an order striking off a decree pro confesso.

May 25, 1935, a rule was granted upon plaintiffs’ attorney to produce and file his warrant or warrants of attorney for the one hundred and ninety-two persons joined as parties plaintiff, “all other proceedings in this case to be stayed until such warrant or warrants of attorney shall have been produced and filed as aforesaid.” *

July 3, 1937, with this stay order in existence, upon a praecipe signed by seven of the one hundred and ninety-two plaintiffs and eleven other persons not parties to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Crescent Canal Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Abernethy v. . BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Boca & Loyalton R.R. v. Superior Court of Lassen Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Electric Utilities Co. v. SmallpageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API