Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefer,
This appeal is from an order striking off a decree pro confesso.
May 25, 1935, a rule was granted upon plaintiffs’ attorney to produce and file his warrant or warrants of attorney for the one hundred and ninety-two persons joined as parties plaintiff, “all other proceedings in this case to be stayed until such warrant or warrants of attorney shall have been produced and filed as aforesaid.” *
July 3, 1937, with this stay order in existence, upon a praecipe signed by seven of the one hundred and ninety-two plaintiffs and eleven other persons not parties to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Crescent Canal Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Abernethy v. . BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Boca & Loyalton R.R. v. Superior Court of Lassen Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Electric Utilities Co. v. SmallpageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940