Legal Opinion

McBurney v. Knox

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1922No. 3067PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

This was an action, brought by plaintiffs in error against defendant in error, to recover an undivided % interest in 354 acres of land in Sabine County.

Defendant in error sought to defeat the title of plaintiffs in error by showing that he held a superior title, which had been acquired under the five years statute of limitations.

The practically undisputed facts disclosed that one Garlington entered on the 354 acres about 1896, clearing and fencing about 15 acres during that year; that Garlington claimed only the land within bis enclosure from 1896 to 1905; that William Knox owned an undivided…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holland v. NanceTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Titel v. GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. HollandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  4. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. AinsworthTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Barber v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirby Lumber Company v. ConnTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McBurney v. KnoxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Prince v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. McBurney v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Chittim v. AuldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API