Legal Opinion

McBurney v. Knox

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1925No. 667-4178PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerman, P. J.

This case has been once before the Supreme Court. At that time it was reversed and remanded for another trial. 111 Tex. 510, 241 S. W. 1000.

The land in controversy is an undivided interest of 177 acres in 354% acres of the William Isaacks survey in Sabine county, Tex. The title to this 354% acres was formerly in William A. Donaho and wife, Harriett A. Donaho. William A. Donaho died, leaving one child, T. J. Donaho. By a general warranty deed dated March 15, 1871, T. J. Donaho conveyed to R. J. Jennings the entire 354% acres. At that time Harriett A. Donaho was married to R. J. Jennings, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McBurney v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Anna & Graham v. StuveTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McBurney v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jones v. SilerTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Republic Production Co. v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Stukes v. Bachmeyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  5. Long v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API