Legal Opinion
Thomas Hunt, Maria Hunt v. Acromed Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 16, 1992No. 91-1851PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Acromed Corporation appeals from an order entered on September 4, 1991, denying its motion to amend its notice of removal of this action from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County to the Unitéd States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The district court denied the motion on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction and, as we agree, we will dismiss the appeal.
The facts of the case are not in dispute. The appellees, Thomas Hunt and Maria Hunt, who are husband and wife and are citizens of Pennsylvania, brought…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Foster v. Chesapeake Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Jeffrey D. Brierly, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Brierly v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc. David EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Brown v. JevicCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re U.S. HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Quaestor Investments, Inc. v. State of ChiapasTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Jeffrey A. Mints v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.