Legal Opinion

Trice v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1987No. 84-518PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted of willfully failing to appear in court when required, a crime commonly known as bail jumping, in violation of the District of Columbia Bail Act, D.C.Code § 23-1327(a) (1981). On appeal he contends that the evidence on the element of willfulness was insufficient to support his conviction, and that the trial court’s instructions to the jury were confusing and incomplete. We reject all his arguments and affirm the conviction.

I

The government presented no live testimony in its case in chief but simply introduced four exhibits, each a photocopy of an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Andy Chavez v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  2. United States v. Gary StewartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. Conley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Hunter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  5. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API