Legal Opinion

Beaston v. Sundt Companies

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 15, 2011No. CV 09-551-TUC-AWTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

A. WALLACE TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.

Peggy J. Beaston (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against The Sundt Companies (“Sundt”), Carol W. Peabody, a member of the Sundt ESOP Advisory Committee (“Peabody”), and the Sundt Companies ESOP Committee (the “Committee”). (The defendants, collectively, are hereinafter referred to as “Defendants.”) Plaintiff alleges discrimination, breach of fiduciary and cofiduciary duty, fraud, and misrepresentation by Defendants, giving rise to a cause of action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Pending before the court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API