Legal Opinion

North Pacifica, LLC v. City of Pacifica

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 16, 2004No. C-01-4823 EMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (Docket No. 333); AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE FROMM DECLARATION UNDER SEAL AND IN CAMERA (Docket No. 353)

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff North Pacifica LLC (“NP”) has filed a motion to disqualify Defendant the City of Pacifica’s experts, Sanford Skaggs and Daniel Curtin, as well as current counsel for the City (ie., the McDonough firm and the Gagen firm). The Court held a hearing on NP’s motion on September 8, 2004, at the conclusion of which the Court granted the motion to disqualify Mr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Cordy v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  5. Shadow Traffic Network v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mid America Agri Products v. RowlandsNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Televisa, S.A. De C v. v. Univision Communications, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
  3. Evans v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2024
  4. SLPR v. San Diego Unified Port Dist. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API