In re the Arbitration between Karpinecz & Marshall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In our opinion, the above issue constitutes a bona fide dispute which relates to the conduct of the corporate business and is embraced within the stockholders’ agreement to arbitrate. “ While it is true that whether or not a bona fide dispute exists is for the court (Matter of Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, 239 N. Y. 199), it is equally true that in a proceeding to compel arbitration the question for the court to pass upon is whether the written contract provides for arbitration and, if so, whether there was a failure to proceed with the obligation to arbitrate (Matter of Kahn…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In Re the Arbitration Between Lipschutz & GutwirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Matter of Kahn (National City Bank)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Siegel & LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Lee v. MarcusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- INTERNAT'L BROTH. OF TEAM. v. Bergen-Hudson Roofing Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Metropolitan District Commission v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthorityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.