Legal Opinion
Metropolitan District Commission v. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 12, 2011No. AC 32418PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
In this action to compel arbitration, the defendant, the Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the Metropolitan District Commission. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly interpreted the parties’ contract and (2) abused its discretion by failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the present appeal. In 1984, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In Re Arbitration Between Astoria Medical Group & Health Insurance PlanNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- In Re the Arbitration Between Siegel & LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metropolitan District v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- DeRose v. Jason Robert's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019