Legal Opinion

Yarbrough v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 18, 2003No. A03A2136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Steven Yarbrough guilty of trafficking in methamphetamine 1 and operating a motor vehicle without proper insurance. Yarbrough appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal on the methamphetamine trafficking charge and in denying his motion to suppress evidence. The arguments are without merit, so we affirm Yarbrough’s conviction.

1. “It is well settled that the standard of review for the denial of a motion for directed verdict of acquittal is the same as that for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Bain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Hammond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Gilmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Santibanez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API