Legal Opinion

Santibanez v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 2009No. A09A0952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

A jury found Pedro Arroyo Santibanez guilty of trafficking in methamphetamine, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute. On appeal, Santibanez challenges the denial of his motion to suppress the drug evidence, the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his conviction for trafficking in methamphetamine, the admission of hearsay evidence, the propriety of certain remarks made by the prosecutor during the state’s closing argument, and the rejection of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Lajara v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Joseph Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API