Mackin v. Alaska Refrigerator Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Argued April 5, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff, a young man between 38 and 19 years of age, recovered a judgment for $5,000 for the loss of a hand which was mutilated by defendant’s buzz planer. The plaintiff sought work from defendant’s foreman, and. was at first denied, but, in view of his necessities, *277he was given work at removing small pieces of wood from the planer table after the operator of the machine had dressed them on the machine. These sticks were piled up by the operator, in lots of 10, upon the table, after they had been planed. The plaintiff describes the machine as a table with a slot about two inches or more…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Prentiss v. Kent Furniture Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- German-American Lumber Co. v. HannahSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Consolidated Stone Co. v. RedmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Hathaway v. Washington Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Koetsier v. Cargill Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.