Legal Opinion

Dieterle v. Yellow Cab Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1942No. Civ. 12869PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

Plaintiffs were passengers for a reward in a taxicab of defendant Yellow Cab Company, operated by defendant Nave. The action was for damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision at an intersection between the cab and an automobile. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment for defendants Yellow Cab Company and Nave entered upon the verdict of a jury.

This is the second appeal in this action. Upon the first trial the defendants were the Yellow Cab Company, Nave, one LaPorce, who was the driver of the automobile, and one Whelan, the alleged owner thereof. Judgment in that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Squier v. Davis Standard Bread Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hellman v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Dieterle v. Yellow Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Chandler v. BenafelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Gall v. Union Ice CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Lund v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Dodds v. StellarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API