Fluhr v. Allstate Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs initially brought an action for breach of a written contract of insurance. Summary judgment was entered for the defendant because the action had not been brought within the time permitted either by statute (see G. L. c. 175, § 99) or by the terms of the contract of insurance. The plaintiffs brought a second action against the defendants, alleging a breach by the defendants of an oral agreement to pay the insurance claim. The case was tried to a jury, who returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The judge, after memoranda and argument, ruled that the rights of the parties…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyd v. Jamaica Plain Co-Operative BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Mackintosh v. ChambersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Wright MacHine Corp. v. Seaman-Andwall Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Franklin v. North Weymouth Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Almeida v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Leonard J. Rose v. Town of HarwichCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Saint Louis v. Baystate Medical Center, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- City of Salem v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Chestnut Hill Development Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Dowd v. MorinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.