Curnow v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The question in this case is whether John Curnow (Curnow) met his statutorily imposed duty of establishing “by clear and convincing evidence a lack of prejudice to the employer or division in investigating the accident and in monitoring medical treatment.” Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-502(c) (1991). The statute requires an employee to report an injury to his employer within seventy-two hours after the general nature of the injury becomes apparent and, within ten days, file the report in the office of the clerk of court. The hearing examiner found Curnow had failed to meet the statutory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Hepp v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. WhiteWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Big Horn Coal Company v. WartenslebenWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
- Sinclair Trucking v. BaileyWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wesaw v. Quality MaintenanceWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. BarkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Zielinske v. Johnson County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Beitel v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Matter of ZielinskeWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.