Sinclair Trucking v. Bailey
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Justice.
Employer, Sinclair Oil Company Trucking Division (Sinclair), appeals a district court order which affirmed a hearing examiner’s decision to award worker’s compensation benefits to employee, William Bailey (Bailey), as a result of treatment of hemorrhoids and finally surgery.
We affirm.
Sinclair raises two issues:
I. Were the findings and conclusions of the administrative law judge arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with the law, and thus unlawful under W.S. § 16-3-114(c)(ii)(A) (1977 Repub.Ed.)?
a. Was the administrative law judge’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Consolidated Freightways v. DrakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of Injury to CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Johnson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Collins v. Goeman General TireWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Pino v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Stuckey v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.