Mattel v. Pittman Construction Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CHASEZ, Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action against Pittman Construction Company, Inc., and its insurer, Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, to recover disability benefits for facial disfigurement and impairment of a physical function, under the Louisiana Compensation Act. A peremptory exception to the jurisdiction ratione materiae was filed in the court below and referred to the merits. After a trial on the merits, the exception was maintained and the plaintiff’s suit dismissed. From this judgment, plaintiff appeals.
The record indicates that plaintiff, an iron worker, was injured in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Williams v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- Selser v. Bragmans Bluff Lumber Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Johnson v. El Dorado Creosoting Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mattel v. Pittman Construction CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Milligan v. Glenburney Nursing HomeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Mattel v. Pittman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Mattel v. Pittman Construction CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965