Legal Opinion
Mattel v. Pittman Construction Company
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided December 13, 1965No. 47802PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
Quintín J. Mattel, an ironworker, instituted this suit to recover benefits- under the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Statute for injuries sustained by him in an accident which occurred while he was working on a construction job in Gulfport, Mississippi. He resides in Orleans Parish and holds membership in the Ironworkers’ Union, Local No. 58, of New Orleans.
Plaintiff’s employer, Pittman Construction Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred *543to as Pittman), and its insurer, the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, are the defendants.
Pittman is a Delaware corporation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Cobb v. International Paper CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Woodham v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Mattel v. Pittman Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
3Cited by26 opinions
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Houle v. Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Ryder v. Insurance Company of North AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Bolton v. Tulane University of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.